page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25 page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58
page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
page 140
page 141
page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
< prev - next > Energy Hydro power civil_works_guidelines_for_micro_hydro (Printable PDF)
CIVIL WORKS GUIDELINES FOR MICRO-HYDROPOWER IN NEPAL
23
these rivers provide more flexibility. For example, it is possible
to use more permanent river control structures such as concrete
or masonry weirs and river training walls.
3.4 Intake types
3.4.1 DESCRIPTION
Types of intake structure are chiefly distinguished by the method
used to divert water from the river. In micro-hydropower, mainly
two types of intake are used which are as follows:
Side intake
Bottom intake
Apart from the above types, an innovative intake called
“Coanda intake” has also been field tested in a micro-hydro
scheme in the UK. This is discussed in Chapter 10
(Innovations).
3.4.2 SELECTION CRITERIA
Table 3.2 aids the choice between side and bottom intakes
for given conditions.
TABLE 3.2 Selection criteria for side and bottom intake
SELECTION CRITERIA
SIDE INTAKE
Amount of water:
Favourable site selection necessary
(outside of a bend, or an artificial bend
by groins) if the amount of diverted
water is greater than 50% of the
water supplied.
Gradient of river:
• very high (i > 10%)
to high (10% > i > l%)
Favourable: maintenance free
operation of the intake structure
should be ensured as far as possible.
BOTTOM INTAKE
The bottom screen draws off the
river water up to the capacity
limit of the screen (i.e. all river
flow if screen is large enough).
Favourable for very high gradient;
can be maintenance-free,
if properly designed.
• mean gradient
(1% > i > 0.01%)
Plan of river:
• straight
• winding
• branched
Suspended sediment
concentration:
• high
• low
Bed load transport:
• strong
• weak
Favourable
Possible
Very favourable if the river channel is
stable; when arranged on the outside
bend.
Unfavourable; damming of the river
is required.
Unfavourable if i < 10%.
Unfavourable: fine bed load
into the initial headrace canal
results in difficulty in flushing.
Very favourable, as bottom
screen is uniformly loaded.
Unfavourable, as bottom screen
is not uniformly loaded.
Unfavourable.
Suitable in combination with very
efficient settling basin.
Well suited
Less suitable,
Well suited
Suitable as long as sufficient amount of
water remains in the river for flushing.
Well suited
Less suitable
Well suited